Britain


A couple of days ago, a man with a tousled mop of hair, a paunch and a beard knocked on my door. I had never met him before, but without any questions I handed Manu — for that was his name — a perfectly functional Freeview box that the efreaks no longer needed. He smiled, thanked me and headed off into the night…

No, I said Freegle

This was my first experience of Freegling. Using Freegle is beautifully simple. If you have something you are keen to get rid of but don’t want to dump it at the tip, you pop the details on a website. Other people who live near you see it online and, if they want it, drop you an email and arrange to pick it up. I had 20 emails within two days for the Freeview box (remote control included). Alan wanted it for more channel choice during the World Cup. Kati wanted it because her’s had broken down and the kids were pestering her to watch TV during half term. Rowan definitely wanted it, although he wasn’t sure how it worked. In the end, I plumped for Manu simply because he was the first person to email me (about an hour after I posted it) — but apparently in Freegle etiquette, you can choose whoever you like to give it to.

We have an increasing problem with waste in the UK, as landfills are filling up fast. Of course, the best thing to do to help is stop buying stuff you don’t need. But before you throw away the 18th candlestick holder you got as an engagement present, think about whether some poor sucker who (more…)

When I was a teenager, I had two back-up conversation plans: football and Neighbours. I did not really do very well at small talk, a slight barrier when trying to meet girls. So I knew that if I rambled on about the vegetarian fusspot Harold Bishop, star of the suburban, Australian soap, most people would know what I was talking about. It was a patch of common ground from where we would begin scaling conversational mountains (like Home & Away)…

Wind farm devastates Wimbledon landscape

When you are trying to nudge friends towards engaging with environmental problems, you need to find something, anything that can start moving them away from the energy-hungry, how-can-I-do-anything-about-climate-change attitude. It is obviously not an easy journey, and they won’t be volunteering to scale coal-fired power stations for Greenpeace the next weekend. First you need a little thing, an ‘in’, that shows them that the idea of a greenish life is not very far from where they are.

For efreak’s mother-in-law it is recycling, an obsession. Another popular way, as I wrote previously, is by growing stuff. Some people just like the feeling of being smug. For me, it is walking. In Hong Kong, where I used to live, I could not think of a better way of (more…)

There were high hopes among some treehuggers that the new coalition would make green issues a priority, mainly because it was one of the few things the Cleggies and Cameroons vaguely agreed on. The Tories’ recent shift to ‘Vote Blue, Go Green’ appears to have convinced the LibDems that Dave’s chums are not the evil babykillers they all said six days ago.

The coalition agreement specifies 19 separate environmental policies. Here is a quick summary and that all-important efreak commentary:

Transport

LibDemCon: bad for stag dos

(1) Replace air passenger duty with per flight duty. This means each plane trip will be taxed, not each passenger. This should encourage airlines to make sure flights are fuller, and could hit freight travel. This could be a huge deal, depending on what level the tax is set at. LibDems said in their manifesto they could raise £3.5 billion from this, which is a lot. Expect plenty of bleating from cheap airlines and tulip sellers. Could be bad news for that weekend jaunt to Aberdeen.

Other air travel measures included (2) the cancellation of the third runway at Heathrow and (3) no (more…)

There remain few industries in which Britain leads the world — arms-selling, high-end motor sport, queuing… One that does not get much attention is offshore wind. Obviously, we do not design any of the turbines ourselves, we leave that to those clever Germans and Danes. But after a flurry of activity in recent years, Britain now generates more electricity from wind turbines plonked in our seas than anywhere else in the world.

How much?

A combination of very strong winds and arch-Nimbyism means that if we want to meet our aggressive targets to increase the amount of electricity from renewable sources (wind, solar, etc) we need an enormous increase in offshore wind over the next 15 years, from 1GW of current capacity to about 29GW (producing at least a sixth of the UK’s electricity needs). This means putting up a new giant turbine in tricky waters every day between now and 2016 (over the last six years, we have erected one every 11 days. Lazy).

Unsurprisingly, offshore wind is more expensive than onshore wind. But while you generally expect new technologies to get cheaper as they mature (think how cheap DVD players are now), new (more…)

Not the ideal week to argue for more oil wells. 5,000 barrels a day of the gloopy stuff is flooding out of an oil rig off the coast of Louisiana. Shrimpers, fisherman and industries that rely on tourism all face collapse, just five years after hurricane Katrina. It is an monumental, horrendous — perhaps preventable — environmental disaster.

Joe Romm, the impeccably angry rabblerouser at Climate Progress, says the disaster is Obama’s “best chance to shift the debate from the dirty, unsafe energy of the 19th century to the clean, safe energy of the 21st century.” Romm, and a group of other writers, think he is blowing it with the president’s characteristically cautious approach.

I'll just sit here until global oil supplies run out

So why is Obama hesitant? Is he waiting for the killer TV image of a stumbling, oil-enveloped seagull collapsing on a blackened beach before he really sticks it to BP and the other oil giants? Or is he slightly sheepish after he agreed five weeks ago, with disastrous timing, that more oil wells could be sunk off the coast of the US? Either way, he needs to argue that oil is environmentally disastrous, it is running out, we need to stop using so much of it and we need to start now. He needs to draw a clear line between the oil disaster and people filling up their cars (and fishing boats, for that matter). This spill is not just a safety failure, it is inevitable if you have an economy that relies on the black gold. If you do not want something like this to happen again, the easiest way is simply to use less petrol.

So is the spill having an impact on the debate in the UK election? Like the herd of major issue elephants in the room, (more…)

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.